Skip to content
Medical AI ReportIndependent evaluations

1 of 11 categories · Updated September 2026

DeepScribe review

DeepScribe is scored in one of the 11 categories on this site. It scores 26/50 for AI medical scribes. It does not rank first in any category scored here.

Reviewed by Abishek Shahi, MD · Last reviewed September 2026

Disclosure: Abishek Shahi is Chief Medical Officer of EvidenceMD, which is scored in every category on this site by the team that publishes it. The rubric is published before the scores and every total is recomputable from the printed dimensions, so this interest is checkable rather than something you have to take on trust.

Best score
26/50
Average
26/50
Categories
1
Ranked first
0

The scores

How is DeepScribe scored in each category?

Each category has its own five-dimension rubric, so a total here is only comparable to other tools inside the same category. Every dimension is worth 10 points.

AI medical scribes

Best MEAT-criteria capture for community oncology

26/50

10th of 10

DeepScribe dimension scores for AI medical scribes
Clinical reasoningDocumentation integrityWorkflow & templatesEHR & deploymentAccess & price
4/107/105/107/103/10
Best for
Community oncology practices on OncoEMR or iKnowMed, where the documentation problem is capturing MEAT criteria against HCC conditions. It is the only tool scored here that documents a per-condition Monitor, Evaluate, Assess and Treat summary.
Limitation
Almost nothing is publicly checkable: no price, no template, note-type or specialty count, no developer API and no product documentation site at all. Its widely-quoted 98.8 KLAS score is an Emerging Company Spotlight carrying the vendor's own limited-data asterisk, and the same vendor quotes it as 98.3 elsewhere.
Price
Not published; enterprise, sales-led

Pattern

Where DeepScribe wins and where it loses

Full marks

DeepScribe takes no full-mark dimension on this site. Its strongest result is 26/50 for AI medical scribes.

Weakest dimensions

  • Access & priceScribes3/10
  • Clinical reasoningScribes4/10
  • Workflow & templatesScribes5/10

Head to head

DeepScribe compared with 9 scored alternatives

Only tools that share a rubric are compared. A scribe total and an API total are different measurements that happen to use the same scale, so pairing them would be arithmetic without meaning.

Limits

What this review cannot tell you

This page aggregates scores from the category rubrics. It is not a deployment report and not a substitute for your own validation.

Scores measure documented capability, not outcomes in your clinic. DeepScribe has not been tested here against live patient data, and no score on this page reflects implementation quality, support responsiveness or contracted uptime. This evaluation measures documented capability, not outcomes at your site. Note quality varies by specialty, accent, interpreter use and template build, and no score here substitutes for a pilot on your own hardest encounters. Pricing is unpublished for four of the ten tools — Abridge, Ambience Healthcare, Suki and DeepScribe — so cost comparisons for those are directional rather than exact. Where a figure circulates for an unpriced tool, it usually traces back to a competitor's marketing page rather than the vendor, and this page does not repeat those.

Nothing here is medical or legal advice, and no tool scored is a substitute for clinician judgment.

Sourcing

Where these scores come from

Common questions

Common questions about DeepScribe

What does DeepScribe score?

DeepScribe is scored in one of the 11 categories on this site. It scores 26/50 for AI medical scribes. It does not rank first in any category scored here. Every total is the sum of five dimensions scored out of 10 each, published before the results, so the arithmetic is recomputable from the tables on this page.

What is DeepScribe best at?

DeepScribe takes no full-mark dimension on this site. Its highest total is 26/50 for AI medical scribes, ranking 10th of 10. Community oncology practices on OncoEMR or iKnowMed, where the documentation problem is capturing MEAT criteria against HCC conditions. It is the only tool scored here that documents a per-condition Monitor, Evaluate, Assess and Treat summary.

What are the limitations of DeepScribe?

Almost nothing is publicly checkable: no price, no template, note-type or specialty count, no developer API and no product documentation site at all. Its widely-quoted 98.8 KLAS score is an Emerging Company Spotlight carrying the vendor's own limited-data asterisk, and the same vendor quotes it as 98.3 elsewhere. Its weakest dimension scores are 3/10 on access & price for AI medical scribes, 4/10 on clinical reasoning for AI medical scribes and 5/10 on workflow & templates for AI medical scribes.

How much does DeepScribe cost?

Not published; enterprise, sales-led Pricing is taken from the vendor's published pricing page where one exists; where it does not, that absence is recorded rather than estimated.

What are the alternatives to DeepScribe?

Abridge, Ambience Healthcare, Commure Scribe and EvidenceMD are scored against DeepScribe on at least one shared rubric. Against Abridge for AI medical scribes: 26–40. Against Ambience Healthcare for AI medical scribes: 26–37. Against Commure Scribe for AI medical scribes: 26–30. Against EvidenceMD for AI medical scribes: 26–39.