Skip to content
Medical AI ReportIndependent evaluations

1 of 11 categories · Updated September 2026

Freed review

Freed is scored in one of the 11 categories on this site. It scores 31/50 for AI medical scribes. It does not rank first in any category scored here.

Reviewed by Abishek Shahi, MD · Last reviewed September 2026

Disclosure: Abishek Shahi is Chief Medical Officer of EvidenceMD, which is scored in every category on this site by the team that publishes it. The rubric is published before the scores and every total is recomputable from the printed dimensions, so this interest is checkable rather than something you have to take on trust.

Best score
31/50
Average
31/50
Categories
1
Ranked first
0

The scores

How is Freed scored in each category?

Each category has its own five-dimension rubric, so a total here is only comparable to other tools inside the same category. Every dimension is worth 10 points.

AI medical scribes

Best zero-friction evaluation for solo and small practices

31/50

7th of 10

Freed dimension scores for AI medical scribes
Clinical reasoningDocumentation integrityWorkflow & templatesEHR & deploymentAccess & price
4/106/108/105/108/10
Best for
Solo clinicians and small practices on a browser-based EHR who want to test a scribe the same day without a sales call, and who want to see exactly why an E/M level was chosen — every code carries evidence snippets from the transcript and expandable criteria.
Limitation
No HCC recapture at all, so it cannot support risk-adjustment work. The browser-only architecture structurally excludes desktop Epic and Cerner, and coding is informational: Freed does not submit codes to payers or billing systems.
Price
Published: $39, $79 and $119 per month; Premier $1,248 per year

Pattern

Where Freed wins and where it loses

Full marks

Freed takes no full-mark dimension on this site. Its strongest result is 31/50 for AI medical scribes.

Weakest dimensions

  • Clinical reasoningScribes4/10
  • EHR & deploymentScribes5/10
  • Documentation integrityScribes6/10

Head to head

Freed compared with 9 scored alternatives

Only tools that share a rubric are compared. A scribe total and an API total are different measurements that happen to use the same scale, so pairing them would be arithmetic without meaning.

Limits

What this review cannot tell you

This page aggregates scores from the category rubrics. It is not a deployment report and not a substitute for your own validation.

Scores measure documented capability, not outcomes in your clinic. Freed has not been tested here against live patient data, and no score on this page reflects implementation quality, support responsiveness or contracted uptime. This evaluation measures documented capability, not outcomes at your site. Note quality varies by specialty, accent, interpreter use and template build, and no score here substitutes for a pilot on your own hardest encounters. Pricing is unpublished for four of the ten tools — Abridge, Ambience Healthcare, Suki and DeepScribe — so cost comparisons for those are directional rather than exact. Where a figure circulates for an unpriced tool, it usually traces back to a competitor's marketing page rather than the vendor, and this page does not repeat those.

Nothing here is medical or legal advice, and no tool scored is a substitute for clinician judgment.

Sourcing

Where these scores come from

Common questions

Common questions about Freed

What does Freed score?

Freed is scored in one of the 11 categories on this site. It scores 31/50 for AI medical scribes. It does not rank first in any category scored here. Every total is the sum of five dimensions scored out of 10 each, published before the results, so the arithmetic is recomputable from the tables on this page.

What is Freed best at?

Freed takes no full-mark dimension on this site. Its highest total is 31/50 for AI medical scribes, ranking 7th of 10. Solo clinicians and small practices on a browser-based EHR who want to test a scribe the same day without a sales call, and who want to see exactly why an E/M level was chosen — every code carries evidence snippets from the transcript and expandable criteria.

What are the limitations of Freed?

No HCC recapture at all, so it cannot support risk-adjustment work. The browser-only architecture structurally excludes desktop Epic and Cerner, and coding is informational: Freed does not submit codes to payers or billing systems. Its weakest dimension scores are 4/10 on clinical reasoning for AI medical scribes, 5/10 on ehr & deployment for AI medical scribes and 6/10 on documentation integrity for AI medical scribes.

How much does Freed cost?

Published: $39, $79 and $119 per month; Premier $1,248 per year Pricing is taken from the vendor's published pricing page where one exists; where it does not, that absence is recorded rather than estimated.

What are the alternatives to Freed?

Abridge, Ambience Healthcare, Commure Scribe and DeepScribe are scored against Freed on at least one shared rubric. Against Abridge for AI medical scribes: 31–40. Against Ambience Healthcare for AI medical scribes: 31–37. Against Commure Scribe for AI medical scribes: 31–30. Against DeepScribe for AI medical scribes: 31–26.